In response to my recent post about the slush pile, reader Frank Renfro asks some pertinent questions about how editors think about the dozens of projects that come over the transom every week. To quote:
“As an editor who receives plenty of unsolicited manuscripts–the slush–how do you discern the good, the bad, the ugly, the great? Is there an intuition that you sense from the opening sentence or paragraph of a new work of fiction, cookbook, essay, or collection of poems?
Is it important that the author be known to you beforehand, that is, even if a stranger, that there be a referral from another trusted source? Or, if a stranger, how much time do you spend reviewing a new piece of slush?”
Here’s my Philosophy of Slush, combined with some advice:
Relevance: It’s easy to reject a great deal of proposals right off the bat because the subject matter is inappropriate for Chronicle Books. A quick review of our website should make it clear that we don’t publish books on traffic safety, psychology textbooks, etc. I know there are books that list the addresses of hundreds of publishers, but those should only be a starting-off point for an aspiring author. Research the publishers you are interested in. Find published books similar in subject or spirit to your own and see who published them.
Intuition: There is an element of intuition about what’s not going to make it, combined with the experience of opening thousands of envelopes. For example, a thin packet is usually a query letter (which we don’t accept). Long, meandering, highly personal cover letters usually introduce projects that appeal to a very small audience. A proposal that features lots of branded, trademarked terms with ® or © symbols doesn’t feel very Chronicle to me. Lots of misspellings (especially my name!) and crazy formatting often portend an inattention to such small details as researching competitive titles or determining the market for the book.
Audience: When the author says that their book appeals to “everyone” or “everyone who watches Oprah,” I am skeptical. Not even the Bible is for everyone and that’s the biggest selling book of all time! Think it over and give me information I can use. If your book actually only appeals to 20-something urbanites, Don Rickles fans, or suburban moms of teenagers, that’s still a whole lot of people. It’s often easier to publish successfully to a smaller, specific audience–just look at our publishing to see what I mean.
The Author: It doesn’t matter to me if the author is known to me personally, or endorsed by someone I trust, though my curiosity is piqued if the author is published or has a platform. (By platform I mean being known to hundreds of thousands of people, by, say, hosting a show on HGTV. Blogging rarely fits this profile.) But every proposal gets the same fair chance. This I can say is true for every editor here. We keep reading until we find something that tells us it’s a no.
Recipe for Success: As for what works…there’s no formula I can offer. Sometimes it’s a cool new topic, or a very well-executed take on an evergreen topic. Sometimes it’s a person with a platform, or a very credentialed author, but often it’s an unknown author who has a genius idea or really “gets” Chronicle. Usually, though, the winning entries (or strong runners up) have put a lot of thought into what they are doing and are familiar with our publishing.
This is an exciting moment for me as a new blogger…dialogue! I hope this is helpful for aspiring authors. Some of our most exciting acquisitions have come out of the slush pile, so please keep it coming. Hopefully my posts on this topic will increase the success rate for all of us.
Lisa Campbell
Associate Editor
Popularity: 8% [?]